|
Photo courtesy of the NYTimesI know that, falling left of center politically, supporting better health insurance and retirement ages is, in principle, something I’m in support of. But I’m not buying it, and here’s why: this is a selfish publicity stunt, a case when the idealism of better worker’s rights has lost hold of the reality of the situation. While these transit workers (who make, on average, more than twice my own yearly salary, I pause to point out) are striking, those who make far less than they do—20-30k per year, perhaps, in service jobs and otherwise—are stuck without the ability to make it to work. In many cases, these people are paid by the hour, so when they can’t make it to the job, they forfeit that day’s wages.
White collar workers have the ability, usually, to work from home via computer, and therefore their business can go on (and isn’t this the group that the transit union is trying to make a statement to?), plus they are likely paid by salary and aren’t going to lose their money. But the union’s demonstration to fight for workers’ rights has left a sizable majority of those very workers--who are far less better off than they are--without the ability to work, who can’t “telecommute” and who are bearing the brunt of this obstacle.
The point I’m making is that striking is not going to help the workers who the union claims it fights for. Considering the final offer the MTA made to the union at the last minute—which made concessions far past the midway point between the original positions of both organizations—it seems clear that the union would get exactly what it wanted or strike.
I completely respect the union’s ideological goals and desire to see better pay, working conditions, retirement pensions, etc. Roger Toussaint, the president of the union, had this to say about it:
This is a fight over whether hard work will be rewarded with a decent retirement and over the erosion or eventual elimination of health benefits for working people. And it is a fight over dignity and respect on the job; a concept that is alien to the MTA. Transit workers are tired of being under appreciated and disrespected. [...] We call on the good will of New Yorkers, the labor community, and all working people, to recognize that our fight is their fight, and to rally in our support -- to show the MTA that the TWU does not stand alone.These are words that evoke principles one can't really argue with--who would ask for the "erosion and eventual elimination of health benefits"? While he asks the labor community to stand with the union, the strike is simultaneously robbing those workers of the ability to support themselves.
I guess I would be pissed if I spent most of my life underground, too. The subways are pretty depressing, and I was reading a comment on the transit union’s blog (which have since been deleted) by a worker, who railed against people that spit on the workers, piss on the platforms, have no respect, etc.. I don’t really know what to say about that, but stranding 7 million people is obviously not going to make them nicer to you.
5. Stephen Malkmus - Face the Truth
4. Wolf Parade - Apologies to the Queen Mary
3. Clap Your Hands Say Yeah - Clap Your Hands Say Yeah
2. Andrew Bird - Andrew Bird & The Mysterious Production of Eggs
1. Sufjan Stevens - Illinois
10. Bright Eyes - I’m Wide Awake, It’s Morning
9. Antony and the Johnsons - I Am a Bird Now
8. M.I.A. - Arular
7. Art Brut - Bang Bang Rock and Roll
6. Spoon - Gimme Fiction
15. Architecture in Helsinki - In Case We Die
14. Caribou - The Milk of Human Kindness
13. The Decemberists - Picaresque
12. Animal Collective - Feels
11. Broken Social Scene - Broken Social Scene
20. Bloc Party - Silent Alarm
19. Broadcast - Tender Buttons
18. LCD Soundsystem - LCD Soundsystem
17. Iron and Wine - Woman King EP
16. The New Pornographers - Twin Cinema
25. Vitalic - OK Cowboy
24. Danger Doom - The Mouse and the Mask
23. The Boy Least Likely To - The Best Party Ever
22. Franz Ferdinand - You Could Have Had It So Much Better...With Franz Ferdinand
21. Fiery Furnaces - EPJB: When Jacques Chirac says, "No!" to Bush about the Iraq war, it's a delusion. It's to insist on the French as an exception, but there is no French exception.
NYT: Hardly. France chose not to send soldiers to Iraq, which has real meaning for countless individual soldiers, for their families and for the state.
JB: Ah, yes. We are "against" the war because it is not our war. But in Algeria, it was the same. America didn't send soldiers when we fought the Algerian war. France and America are on the same side. There is only one side.
NYT: Isn't that kind of simplistic reasoning why people get so tired of French intellectuals?
There are no more French intellectuals. What you call French intellectuals have been destroyed by the media. They talk on television, they talk to the press and they are no longer talking among themselves.
NYT: Some here feel that the study of the humanities at our universities has been damaged by the incursion of deconstruction and other French theories.
JB: That was the gift of the French. They gave Americans a language they did not need. It was like the Statue of Liberty. Nobody needs French theory.